Phase 1 Read Phase 2 Read Phase 3 Read the reports on the first phase by: Sheila Roberts and Mike Nicol Read the second phase of this story Read the reports on the second phase by: Sheila Roberts and Mike Nicol
Pancho Gonzales and Maxwells DemonTickey de JagerDid you see Sampras play Pioline in the Wimbledon final? Yes. All so dreary and predictable. No finesse, no delicate touches. All power and clinical precision. Ace, ace, serve-volley, ace. One love. Games went to service until Sampras broke Piolines service twice in the first set and once in the others. 6-1, 6-2, 6-2. Yech. The trouble with mens tennis at the moment is that Sampras is so much better than the rest that when he is on form its a walk-over. He must be the best player that ever lived. Maybe. Theres always Bjorn Borg of course. He won Wimbledon five times hand running when John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors were in their prime. I cant remember which of his opponents said: We all play tennis. Borg plays some other game. I think he was the best player that ever lived. I agree. But not the greatest. That was Pancho Gonzales. He not only dominated the game for more than a decade, but he had class in everything he did. He played with effortless ease and immaculate courtesy and was respected and loved by everyone connected with tennis. Even by his opponents, who called him the Magical Mexican. Moreover, the Collins English Dictionary gives his name:
I rest my case. Mind you, Im biased. You see, I once played him. You! Yes me. It is quite a story It would have to be. It all started in the summer of 1950 when David Dorfan in my top maths set asked me what entropy was because he had read that the fundamental law of science was the law of increasing entropy. So I sat on the table, and David winked at the class, and they put their pens down and smiled ... Well done David. Here we go! The law of increasing entropy is more than the fundamental law of science. It is the fundamental law of life. Entropy is the degree of disorder of a system. The law of increasing entropy says that the entropy of any system will increase, that the system will become more and more disorganised. Our very lives depend on that. For instance, there are lots of germs in this room. By the law of increasing entropy they are more or less evenly spread throughout the room. If not, they could all be in one place. Right in front of your nose. And your next breath could be your last. Yes, the law of increasing entropy, the law of the triumph of muddle, is the fundamental law of life. Look at Davids hair, Look at my desk. Unless, of course, we do something to organise things, like putting books in alphabetic order on a shelf. Why do you think entropy will always increase? Peter? Probably because there are more ways for things to be muddled than for them to be nicely organised. Sure. And that is why entropy will increase, muddle will triumph and the universe will eventually run down. A dreary prospect. Still, Ik hef me doots. The universe has been around for a long time, so it should be pretty disorganised by now. But we still have trees and flowers and pretty girls. How come? There must be something working against entropy. In fact, James Clerk Maxwell guessed that there was a little demon that could control the movement of every individual molecule. It came to be known as Maxwells Demon. So everything that is wonderful and beautiful in the world is the work of Maxwells Demon. For instance, look at you lot. The top mathematical set of the school. Big deal. How do you think you got to be so unbearably brilliant? Chance. Chance, the ever present alternative hypothesis . Let me show you. Say there are ten factors that make you bright or dumb. Let us say this coin was spun ten times to decide how bright or dumb Michael would be. Heads for bright, tails for dumb. Here goes. Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads . Nine heads in a row. My hand shook a little. Flip ... Heads. TEN HEADS OUT OF TEN! The probability of that is 1 in 1 024. So now we know why Michael is the way he is. Why you lot are the way you are. As Adam Smal nearly said:
En die dice het reg geval vir djul - Daais mar al. You owe it all to chance. You owe it all to Maxwells Demon. Unknown to me, floating near the ceiling of my classroom, Maxwells Demon heard all this and thought: What an admirable young man. I think I will take a hand in his affairs. In fact, he just had. Sir, what do you mean when you say he can control the movement of every individual molecule? Well, the molecules of air in that tennis ball lying on top of the cupboard are moving at random. If Maxwells Demon could suddenly let them all move upwards, the ball would rise. The ball rose, moved slowly across the room, and when it was nearly above my head fell slowly into my hand. It was cold to the touch … That afternoon there was a tennis match, school versus staff, and I had to play against their number one player, who was far too good for me. The chances that he would start the match with four double faults were remote, but that is what he did. And it never got better for him, so I won easily. It would take too long to give the train of events by which I found myself playing Pancho Gonzales in the Wimbledon final that year. To understand how I got through to the final you must understand one thing: hitting a tennis ball is a delicate matter. The ball must be in exactly the right place for the shot you want to play, and you must be sure it will be there. If it moves unpredictably just before the racket hits it, the best player in the world cannot play any shot with confidence or success. My passage to the final was a nightmare for all my opponents and an unbearable irritation to the spectators. So when Pancho stood ready to serve in the first game of the final, there was more at stake than the Wimbledon title. Everyone was looking forward to seeing how their idol was going to demolish this little rabbit who had made a mockery of tennis for two weeks. And did not even use a Maxply. Pancho tossed up the ball, pulled back his racket, transferred his weight from his right leg to his left as he reached up and came forward to hit the ball at the top of its arc. As the racquet was about to hit it, the ball moved suddenly forward. The service hit the top of the net and fell back.
For his second service he used his famous American topspin back kick service. At the last moment the ball moved sharply forward and he missed it completely.
After four double faults a bewildered Pancho stood ready to face my first service. I hit it with all my strength, and as the racquet was about to hit it, the ball suddenly rose and I just clipped it. It rose high in the air, landed just over the net with vicious backspin, and bounced back over the net onto my side of the court.
And it was recorded as an ace. In the end Pancho got desperate and used only little lobbed services. Volleys and ground shots were equally impossible. He was reduced to playing like a rabbit and found himself two sets to love down. Then, out of a clear blue sky came a shower of rain and we had to go into the pavilion. As a bemused Pancho was having some tea, a gentle, grey-haired old man joined him and said: Pancho, I am a physicist and I know what is happening to you out there: You are playing against Maxwells Demon. I know I am playing against some kind of devil. Yes, Pancho, but this devil was invented by a physicist, and I know what he can do and what he cant do. I think that for some reason he is trying to let your opponent win, and he can do that by making the ball move suddenly up or down, or back or forward, or left or right, so that you cant hit it properly, and your shots will go out or into the net. But even he has a rule he must stick to:
Improbable? What is that? I am a Mexican and my English is as bad as my tennis was today. He must always let the most impossible thing happen. So? So I think that there is a way that you can win. Keep on trying to do the most difficult things. Close your eyes just before you hit the ball, aim for the outside edges of the line, or aim for a net cord shot. Hit some shots with the edge of your racket. Since what you are trying to do is almost impossible, and it is almost impossible for your De Jager to hit a good shot, Maxwells Demon will not know what to do and you will have a chance. Try it. What have you got to lose? Things can t get worse. O K. Us Mexicans are superstitious. I will fight this devil with madness. Go for it! I never liked Maxwell anyway. And so things changed completely in the next two sets, and the old Pancho seemed to be back, although he did some absurd things and played some incredible shots. His overhead backhand smash with the left hand is still in the Guinness Book of Records as the greatest shot ever played. In no time at all he took the next two sets 6 0, 6 0. But as I sat in my chair before the final set, I realised that the old man I had seen talking to Pancho was the great physicist George Gamow. I had guessed that Maxwells Demon was taking a hand in my tennis, but now I remembered what George Gamow had written about Maxwells Demon: He must always let the most improbable happen. So, to have a chance of winning I must also try to do the improbable. It worked. Poor Maxwells Demon did not know which of two improbables he had to let happen, and so the match was even. At last I was serving for the match at 8 7 and 40 30, and Pancho presented me with an open court and a gentle lob at the net. I did not need Maxwells Demon for this. I hit the most perfect smash of my life: in the corner, three inches inside the base line and three inches inside the side line. The chances that the linesmen at Wimbledon would call that out were one in a million ... Pancho took the next two points, and then the next two games, and so justice was done after all. If you look up the Wimbledon results for 1950, you will see that Pancho Gonzales took his first Wimbledon singles title that year, but you will not find the name of his opponent. It has been expunged from the records. |
||
© Kopiereg in die ontwerp en inhoud van hierdie webruimte behoort aan LitNet, uitgesluit die kopiereg in bydraes wat berus by die outeurs wat sodanige bydraes verskaf. LitNet streef na die plasing van oorspronklike materiaal en na die oop en onbeperkte uitruil van idees en menings. Die menings van bydraers tot hierdie werftuiste is dus hul eie en weerspieël nie noodwendig die mening van die redaksie en bestuur van LitNet nie. LitNet kan ongelukkig ook nie waarborg dat hierdie diens ononderbroke of foutloos sal wees nie en gebruikers wat steun op inligting wat hier verskaf word, doen dit op hul eie risiko. Media24, M-Web, Ligitprops 3042 BK en die bestuur en redaksie van LitNet aanvaar derhalwe geen aanspreeklikheid vir enige regstreekse of onregstreekse verlies of skade wat uit sodanige bydraes of die verskaffing van hierdie diens spruit nie. LitNet is ’n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf. |