Seminar Room - reviews, essays, articles, opinionsArchive
Tuis /
Home
Briewe /
Letters
Bieg /
Confess
Kennisgewings /
Notices
Skakels /
Links
Boeke /
Books
Onderhoude /
Interviews
Fiksie /
Fiction
Poësie /
Poetry
Taaldebat /
Language debate
Opiniestukke /
Essays
Rubrieke /
Columns
Kos & Wyn /
Food & Wine
Film /
Film
Teater /
Theatre
Musiek /
Music
Resensies /
Reviews
Nuus /
News
Feeste /
Festivals
Spesiale projekte /
Special projects
Slypskole /
Workshops
Opvoedkunde /
Education
Artikels /
Features
Geestelike literatuur /
Religious literature
Visueel /
Visual
Reis /
Travel
Expatliteratuur /
Expat literature
Gayliteratuur /
Gay literature
IsiXhosa
IsiZulu
Nederlands /
Dutch
Hygliteratuur /
Erotic literature
Kompetisies /
Competitions
Sport
In Memoriam
Wie is ons? /
More on LitNet
Adverteer op LitNet /
Advertise on LitNet
LitNet is ’n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf.

Statement in response to charges that Antjie Krog plagiarised Ted Hughes in Country of My Skull (Random House, Johannesburg 1998)

Stephen Johnson; Managing Director Random House

Our author has informed us of a claim of plagiarism levelled against her in a letter that she received during the course of 2005.

The letter writer asserted that Krog had plagiarised Ted Hughes in her work Country of My Skull that was published by Random House in 1998.

This claim has now been repeated in a piece written by Stephen Watson and published in the latest edition of the journal New Contrast, of which Watson is the editor.

Krog responded to the letter writer last year, stating that prior to receiving the correspondence concerned, she had not read, seen or heard of the piece by Hughes to which these allegations refer.

We have examined Watson’s claims regarding Krog’s alleged use of the Hughes piece and reject, out of hand, that his argument holds any validity. We cannot tell whether he is confused or deliberately disingenuous in making these claims against Krog. What is clearly apparent, however, is the man’s inability to grasp the nuances of Krog’s writing about myth in her work Country of My Skull. We are dismayed that this lapse should have provoked an altogether unreasonable, venomous and academically shallow diatribe in response. We support fully and without reservation Krog’s efforts to protect her reputation from, particularly, the personal attack recently published in New Contrast.




LitNet: 19 February 2006

Send your comments to webvoet@litnet.co.za to continue the discussion on SêNet, our interactive opinion page.

to the top


© Kopiereg in die ontwerp en inhoud van hierdie webruimte behoort aan LitNet, uitgesluit die kopiereg in bydraes wat berus by die outeurs wat sodanige bydraes verskaf. LitNet streef na die plasing van oorspronklike materiaal en na die oop en onbeperkte uitruil van idees en menings. Die menings van bydraers tot hierdie werftuiste is dus hul eie en weerspieël nie noodwendig die mening van die redaksie en bestuur van LitNet nie. LitNet kan ongelukkig ook nie waarborg dat hierdie diens ononderbroke of foutloos sal wees nie en gebruikers wat steun op inligting wat hier verskaf word, doen dit op hul eie risiko. Media24, M-Web, Ligitprops 3042 BK en die bestuur en redaksie van LitNet aanvaar derhalwe geen aanspreeklikheid vir enige regstreekse of onregstreekse verlies of skade wat uit sodanige bydraes of die verskaffing van hierdie diens spruit nie. LitNet is ’n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf.