|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LitNet is n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf. |
|
|
|
Homebru 2006 author: Dan Wylie
Dan Wylie is the author of Myth of Iron, published by University of KwaZulu Natal Press.
- What does it mean to you to have your writing recognised and
celebrated as "South African"?
My feelings are mixed, since I am only semi-/quasi-/pseudo-South African,
being from Zimbabwe, displaced though not naturalised into South Africa.
I prefer to think of myself as “southern African” – amongst
other possible identities (my book is at least partly about the fluidity
and multifariousness of anyone’s identity). I live here, and valorise
the valorisation of “local belonging” above all else (I don’t
mean to be disparaging of or ungrateful for the Homebru campaign’s
intentions!), but deem nationalist self-congratulation to be pernicious.
- What was it that led you to write a book about this aspect of South
Africa?
It began with Julian Cobbing teaching us third-years a dynamic course
on the Mfecane back in 1982, at Rhodes; it blossomed eventually into a PhD
on white myths of Shaka, which was at least partly a sideways look at the
racialistic mythologies I had been raised on in colonial Rhodesia; and that
cleared the underbrush for a new, hard look at the history of Shaka himself.
I sensed exciting new ground inasmuch as, startlingly and alarmingly, no
full-scale historical biography by a professional scholar seemed ever to
have been written.
- Is it possible for one's thinking, and therefore writing, as a
South African to be free of political and historical influence?
As a human being, you mean. Dream on.
- Is there a writing community in South Africa, or is writing
in this country a solitary journey?
It is neither; one writes alone, but by reading others one joins a “virtual”
community, even if one never makes eyeball-to-eyeball contact. Some of us
work in more solitary ways; others network in less solitary ways. No notions
of community ought to constrain the flights of individual innovation, exploration,
critique – and that’s easy to fall into in our small pond.
- What different (or similar) roles do fiction and non-fiction play
in constructing a South African experience/literature in 2006 and beyond?
That’s a tough one to give a short answer to: I suppose it depends
who reads what; different sections of the population will be differentially
affected. There is a gathering ferment of searching and self-searching in
most genres, I think.
- Do you think South African non-fiction has international appeal?
If so, can the same be said for unashamedly South African fiction?
I can’t answer that, apart from the obvious recognition given to
our Nobel and Booker Prize winners. Many writers abroad, from Justin Cartwright
to Ann Harries, are getting published there, and I suspect many living here
are publishing successfully overseas, too. Local flair and flavour, from
wherever, has never been an impediment to “international appeal”,
so long as the writing itself is powerful and the psychologies of characters
true, wise and humane. I suspect the question itself arises from the old
“cringe factor” in South African identity; why should we be
measuring ourselves against “overseas” in the first place? We
lack ambition, chutzpah, range. Where is our Walcott, our Kazantzakis, our
Dostoevsky? Almost everything written here is miniaturist, small-scale,
bashful. But perhaps, like most places, we still, within that range, produce
some work as good as almost anywhere, and a lot of mediocre stuff as well.
- Who do you think is the most influential South African writer today?
And who is your favourite local author?
For better or worse, I guess JM Coetzee. I don’t have a favourite;
I read different people for different reasons. I do believe Sidney Clouts
to have been our best ever poet, and I return to him again and again.
- If you could choose five works (fiction, non-fiction, poetry, performance
poetry, etc) from South African literature that would be able to communicate
the "South African experience", which five would you choose, and why?
An impossible question, as there is no one “South African experience”.
One can scarcely reconcile, say, Lesego Rampolokeng’s furious rantings
with Cartwright’s excellent White Lightning, or van Onselen’s
The Seed is Mine with the inwardly directed delicate miniatures of
Gabeba Baderoon’s poems. Why should one even try? Some works which
might convey prominent aspects of South African experience, like Jonny Steinberg’s
two brilliantly disturbing books Midlands and The Number,
one hopes never to have to read again. I’d rather read Don Maclennan’s
poems, which have hardly anything to do with a recognisably “South
African experience”, but which transcend all littleness and patriotic
cant.
- What makes you a South African?
I decline to be “made” into anything.
- What is your favourite South Africanism?
I love being in possession of a “rommeltrommel”.
|
Moenie ons Homebru 2006-kompetisie misloop nie!
Wen 'n lekker Suid-Afrikaanse boekpakkie!
Klik hier om meer uit te
vind. |
LitNet: 23 May 2006
Click here to read
answers of the Homebru 2006 fiction writers
Click here to read
the answers of the Homebru 2006 non-fiction writers
Have your say! To comment on this interview write to webvoet@litnet.co.za,
and become a part of our interactive opinion page.
to the top / boontoe
|
© Kopiereg in die ontwerp en inhoud van hierdie webruimte behoort aan LitNet, uitgesluit die kopiereg in bydraes wat berus by die outeurs wat sodanige bydraes verskaf. LitNet streef na die plasing van oorspronklike materiaal en na die oop en onbeperkte uitruil van idees en menings. Die menings van bydraers tot hierdie werftuiste is dus hul eie en weerspieël nie noodwendig die mening van die redaksie en bestuur van LitNet nie. LitNet kan ongelukkig ook nie waarborg dat hierdie diens ononderbroke of foutloos sal wees nie en gebruikers wat steun op inligting wat hier verskaf word, doen dit op hul eie risiko. Media24, M-Web, Ligitprops 3042 BK en die bestuur en redaksie van LitNet aanvaar derhalwe geen aanspreeklikheid vir enige regstreekse of onregstreekse verlies of skade wat uit sodanige bydraes of die verskaffing van hierdie diens spruit nie. LitNet is ’n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf.
|