Taaldebat - Language debateArgief
Tuis /
Home
Briewe /
Letters
Kennisgewings /
Notices
Skakels /
Links
Nuus /
News
Fiksie /
Fiction
Po?sie /
Poetry
Taaldebat /
Language debate
Opiniestukke /
Essays
Boeke /
Books
Film /
Film
Teater /
Theatre
Musiek /
Music
Slypskole /
Workshops
Opvoedkunde /
Education
Artikels /
Features
Visueel /
Visual
Expatliteratuur /
Expat literature
Gayliteratuur /
Gay literature
Xhosa
Zulu
Nederlands /
Dutch
Rubrieke /
Columns
Geestelike literatuur /
Religious literature
Hygliteratuur /
Erotic literature
Sport
Wie is ons? /
More on LitNet
LitNet is ’n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf.
Senior watch slim, Jaeger Le Coulter Masters Series must not replica watches miss. Jaeger Le Coulter's master series is swiss replica watches an entry - level series in the brand, but it replica watches sale also has a complex style to replica watches online the sky.

Don’t blame the victim

Harry Sewlall’s letter, “Let’s tell our students the brutal truth” (June 13), though devoid of truth, is certainly brutal.

It is a shock (though no surprise) to realise that our young people are at the mercy of “educators” with attitudes that should have been buried with the British Empire.

He asks that the brutality facing thousands of students in our country — of having English forced down their throat as a medium of instruction — be held against them: a classic case of blaming the victim.

He starts off by talking about how students struggle with English, and then goes on to draw conclusions about their “competence”. This recalls an insightful statement by Pathiswa Tshangana: “The intellectual capabilities … of any black person are judged on how well they speak English. This kind of assessment is not only culturally biased, but unconstitutional and morally unacceptable in the heterogeneous and democratic society we claim to be.”

Our Constitution recognises 11 official languages and protects the right of all South Africans to be educated in the language of their choice. It also prohibits discrimination on the basis of language. Moves are afoot to implement the sound principle of mother-tongue education in practice.

The day will come when the “intellectual capabilities” of educators will be judged on how well they speak their students’ home languages.

    — Gerrit Brand, Department of Philosophy, Stellenbosch University

Gerrit Brand’s letter that appeared in the Mail & Guardian of 27th June 2003. Reprinted with permission.

boontoe


© Kopiereg in die ontwerp en inhoud van hierdie webruimte behoort aan LitNet, uitgesluit die kopiereg in bydraes wat berus by die outeurs wat sodanige bydraes verskaf. LitNet streef na die plasing van oorspronklike materiaal en na die oop en onbeperkte uitruil van idees en menings. Die menings van bydraers tot hierdie werftuiste is dus hul eie en weerspieël nie noodwendig die mening van die redaksie en bestuur van LitNet nie. LitNet kan ongelukkig ook nie waarborg dat hierdie diens ononderbroke of foutloos sal wees nie en gebruikers wat steun op inligting wat hier verskaf word, doen dit op hul eie risiko. Media24, M-Web, Ligitprops 3042 BK en die bestuur en redaksie van LitNet aanvaar derhalwe geen aanspreeklikheid vir enige regstreekse of onregstreekse verlies of skade wat uit sodanige bydraes of die verskaffing van hierdie diens spruit nie. LitNet is ’n onafhanklike joernaal op die Internet, en word as gesamentlike onderneming deur Ligitprops 3042 BK en Media24 bedryf.